AAA Recommends Travelers Budget $244 Per Day
European Fuel Surcharges Now Being Charged
Our Fulfillment Partner
FAQ's
Will fliers revolt as airfares head up?
   
  Start Your Booking Here

November 12th, 2008

Airlines Take New Approach to International Routes

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Despite the sputtering economy, airlines still see bright spots in international travel, ranging from emerging markets such as Dubai and Liberia, to old favorites including Paris.

This month, for instance, UAL's United Airlines began Washington-Dubai service, while Delta launched Atlanta-Mumbai and announced plans to fly to Monrovia, Liberia, its seventh African destination, in 2009. On Wednesday, Delta will unveil additional international destinations for next year.

Already, US Airways and Delta have said that next summer, three medium-sized cities -- Charlotte, Pittsburgh and Raleigh-Durham -- will have seasonal service to Paris.

"We're pleased with the way [the Dubai route] started out and with what's developing in the Middle East," said Kevin Knight, United's senior vice president of planning, in an interview. "Everything is being impacted by the economy, but the Middle East has been strong. As I tell my employees, we talk about capacity reductions, but we're not solely focused on reducing capacity. There are opportunities. Dubai is one we identified, and we're taking advantage of others, as well."

United is also building its presence in Australia, adding a second nonstop from Los Angeles this summer, giving it nonstop flights to both Melbourne and Sydney. It will add a Dulles-Moscow flight in March, underscoring its confidence in the Dulles hub, which has flights to 21 international cities.

"Dulles flows north/south domestically, and it is a great [international] gateway," says Knight. "It's much more than government traffic. That whole Virginia area has grown exponentially, and we're the beneficiary."

Like other U.S. carriers, United has seen weakness in China. It eliminated the Los Angeles-Hong Kong route it started last year and scaled back frequencies between Dulles and Beijing, just as Delta is pulling back the Atlanta-Shanghai route. Meanwhile, US Airways, AMR's(AMR Quote - Cramer on AMR - Stock Picks) American and United are delaying China startups that had been scheduled for 2009.

The industry "is going through growing pains in Asia right now," Knight said. "But if you look at any outlook, over the long term Asia will continue to be a strong and growing market." United has dropped a San Francisco-Nagoya flight, as well as Los Angeles-Frankfurt, and has eliminated one of two daily San Francisco-Frankfurt flights.

Other carriers apparently have concluded that if any city can retain its appeal to summer leisure passengers, it's Paris. "You see some others pulling back internationally, but you don't see them reducing service to Paris," US Airways CEO Doug Parker said in a recent interview, as the carrier announced the resumption of Charlotte-Paris flights that were eliminated in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Charlotte/Douglas is far bigger today, following the 2005 merger between hub carrier US Airways and America West. In 2003, the airport handled 23.6 million passengers. The total for the first nine months of 2008 was 26.2 million.

Parker noted that US Airways trails the five other legacy carriers in international service. While others have 40% or more of their capacity in international routes, US Airways has just over half that.

"We still have catching up to do," he said. The carrier also plans new service next year from Philadelphia to Birmingham, England, Oslo and Tel Aviv.

Meanwhile, Delta announced summer service to Paris from both Raleigh-Durham and Pittsburgh. The concept seems like a risky one, because Delta lacks domestic feed traffic in both cities. But Delta spokeswoman Betsy Talton says both "are solid business travel markets, and these unique nonstop flights take customers to a strong hub in Paris," with connections to about 90 cities on Delta partner Air France.

Though it has eliminated an Atlanta-Vienna route and seasonally reduced trans-Atlantic service, Delta remains committed to international growth. In December, Delta will begin eight new flights to Latin America, the fastest growing international region. American is the leading carrier between the region and the U.S.

Even as carriers are planning new international flights, JP Morgan analyst Jamie Baker says US Airways and JetBlue(JBLU Quote - Cramer on JBLU - Stock Picks) "remain our favorite names, in large part due to their limited international exposure."

Baker wrote in a recent research report that the only question is "when, not if, the global economy [will] catch up to the U.S. airline industry." JP Morgan has financial relationships, in both investment banking and noninvestment banking, with JetBlue and US Airways.

In general, while domestic flying has been slashed by an unprecedented 10%, international flying by U.S. carriers remains relatively flat. International capacity rose 1.4% in October and 0.5% in November, and will decline by 1.7% in December, roughly in line with seasonal adjustments last year, according to a report by Barclays Capital analyst Gary Chase.

 

Octoer 31st, 2008

Jet fuel's down, but surcharges have stuck

Thai Airways' cheapest Los Angeles-Bangkok ticket last week had a $542 fuel surcharge round trip $352 more than the airline charged a year ago.
The least expensive ticket between Washington, D.C., and Tokyo on All Nippon Airways carried a $630 fuel surcharge, and that was $400 more than a year ago.

Between New York and Dublin, Delta Air Lines' (DAL) cheapest ticket last week came with a $230 surcharge, $138 more than on the same date last year.

Despite lower jet-fuel prices, fuel surcharges on international tickets are much higher than a year ago, according to an analysis of airline fare data for USA TODAY. Surcharges on many tickets have doubled, and many tickets on shorter flights which often burn less fuel have higher surcharges than longer-distance flights.

Most round-trip international tickets still have surcharges ranging from $200 to more than $500, even after airlines lowered the surcharges by $20 to $70 on many U.S.-Europe tickets last week. U.S. domestic fares still carry fuel surcharges, too, but international fares have the highest ones.

Meanwhile, the price of jet fuel in New York last Tuesday fell to $2.32 per gallon and averaged $2.35 on four previous weekdays, according to the most recent Department of Energy statistics. Those prices are lower than the price on Oct. 22, 2007, and about the same as the average price in September 2007.

"All the noise about airlines rolling back their fuel surcharges to pre-oil-crisis levels is a bunch of hooey," says Rick Seaney, CEO of FareCompare.com, which tracks airfares for consumers.

Airlines' views vs. travelers'

Airlines say the surcharges added during the past year did not cover their costs when fuel prices were much higher and that collectively, they still will lose billions of dollars this year. "The price of fuel has risen significantly for months and dropped only recently," says David Castelveter, vice president of the Air Transport Association of America, an airline trade group. "We are far from being out of the woods."

However, the fuel fees, combined with new service fees and increases in airfares, infuriate many travelers.

The surcharges are "a simple money grab by the airlines," says frequent flier Ron Goltsch, an electrical engineer in Parsippany, N.J. "They think we have become so used to seeing surcharges that they think they can add them on with impunity."

For large companies, fuel surcharges may add $10 million to $20 million a year in travel expenses, says Kevin Maguire, president of the National Business Travel Association.

The issue has even attracted attention in Congress. Last week, Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., wrote a letter to 11 U.S. airline CEOs, calling on them to reduce fuel surcharges as soon as possible, because the price of jet fuel had dropped from $4.34 per gallon on July 2 to $2.34 per gallon on Oct. 15.

FareCompare.com analyzed 75 non-stop overseas routes to and from the USA, and compared fuel surcharges for the cheapest coach tickets on Oct. 22, 2008, with the same airline's surcharge on the same date last year.

The comparison shows that:

-Every airline and every route in FareCompare.com's survey showed a higher surcharge than a year ago. The average increase was 67%. Nearly one-quarter of the surcharges last week were more than 90% higher.

-Surcharges for Thai Airways' Los Angeles-Bangkok route and All Nippon Airways' Washington-Tokyo route had the biggest increases, rising 185% and 174% since last October.

-Surcharges for one or more routes of four U.S. airlines American, (AMR) Delta, Continental (CAL) and US Airways (LCC) at least doubled since last fall.

How charges can add up

Fuel surcharges can make up a large percentage of an international ticket's cost. For example, All Nippon's cheapest Washington-Tokyo ticket on Oct. 22 was $1,417, which included $710 in airfare, $630 in fuel surcharge and $77 in taxes and fees.

All Nippon's fuel surcharge is based on the average jet-fuel price in Singapore during a three-month period. The Japanese airline's fuel surcharge for the first three months next year will be based on average prices in Singapore from August through October this year, spokesman Damion Martin says.

Singapore Airlines has a fuel surcharge of $360 round trip for non-stop U.S.-Singapore flights, $440 for one-stop flights and $660 for itineraries with a flight beyond Singapore. Fuel surcharges don't cover the "dramatic increase in fuel prices," says airline spokesman James Boyd.

Northwest Airlines' (NWA) increased costs related to fuel prices "continue to exceed the surcharge levels in place," according to spokeswoman Michelle Aguayo Shannon.

"Many of our fuel surcharges were not in place when oil was at its record high of more than $147 per barrel," she says. "We're still trying to make up for those costs."

American, the largest U.S. carrier, has fuel surcharges on five routes that are 90% or more higher than they were a year ago, FareCompare.com's analysis shows. For example, the fuel surcharge on American's cheapest Chicago-Dublin ticket increased 172%, from $92 to $250.

American changes its surcharges to match competitors, but the airline will not "get into a market-by-market discussion of fuel surcharges," spokesman Tim Smith says.

Jet-fuel prices have not come down as dramatically as oil prices, and fuel costs "continue to bounce around, both up and down, on a daily basis," he says.

Delta Air Lines, which has increased its fuel surcharges 161% between Los Angeles and London, and 150% between New York and Dublin, has a similar view.

"While fuel has come down from the all-time high in July, it continues to be high and volatile," spokeswoman Betsy Talton says. "Delta continuously monitors multiple market factors and remains competitive in the marketplace."

In many cases, fuel surcharges "don't have anything to do with the price of oil nor the distance of the trip," Seaney says. "It's about competition and the price of a ticket."

Of the routes analyzed by FareCompare.com, the longest was 16,536 miles round trip between Chicago and Auckland, New Zealand. Air New Zealand's coach fare on that route had a $220 fuel surcharge — just $10 more than a year ago.

The shortest route in the sample was 6,528 miles round trip between Philadelphia and Dublin. US Airways' coach fare on that route had a $230 fuel surcharge — $70 more than a year ago.

Seaney believes declining oil prices are causing a public relations dilemma for airlines.

"Airlines were able to justify raising ticket prices by pinning it on oil prices, but now they have a public relations headache," he says. "Jet-fuel prices are dropping, and they're keeping the surcharges to try to recoup massive financial losses."

Frequent flier Rip Russell, an accountant in the motion picture industry who lives in Manhattan Beach, Calif., says he thinks fuel surcharges are a "tactic that the airlines have been using to hide the true cost of a ticket."

Some industry consultants and airline-securities analysts side with the airlines.

Aviation consultant Michael Boyd says consumers are not getting cheated by fuel surcharges. With airlines facing billions in losses, "Consumers should feel lucky there's anybody who wants to run an airline."

Ray Neidl, an industry analyst for Calyon Securities, also sees the need for fuel surcharges. Airlines are "still under-pricing their product," and costs "are still exceeding revenues," he says.

Barbara Beyer, president of Avmark, an aviation consulting firm, cautions that the oil market is unstable, and airlines might not want to react too quickly to lower prices.

"Airlines are probably thinking it is better to leave an accepted charge in place as unpopular as it may be than yo-yo back and forth with the charges and annoy their customers all over again."

Good news for fliers?

Airfare expert Tom Parsons sees some hope for fliers.

For the first time this year, U.S. and foreign airlines during the past two weeks have cut fuel surcharges on many routes, he says. The rollbacks are on flights to and from Europe and South America.

Airlines "are finally making adjustments to fuel surcharges on European routes due to the lack of demand for travel to Europe," says Parsons, who runs Bestfares.com, an online ticket wholesaler that identifies fare bargains for consumers.

Parsons expects fuel surcharges to drop further because of a weakening euro. European consumers will pressure European airlines to reduce fuel surcharges, and U.S. carriers will match their foreign competitors, he says.

 

 

October 11th , 2008

Air fares to soar by 13% in 'volatile environment'

The cost of air travel is likely to rise by as much as 13% next year, according to a new industry forecast.

Average fares are expected to go up by between six and eight per cent while additional fees will increase the total cost of air travel even more, according to the study.

Airlines will react to the challenging environment by further trying to reduce costs and exploring ways to add new revenues, leading to an increase in the total cost of air travel, the 2009 Industry Forecast from Advito, an independent consulting unit .

On average we predict 2009 rates to increase against 2008 by six per cent to eight per cent, but with clear differences by region and trip category.

Unlike previous years, unbundling of services and the resulting fees are on the rise, and are projected to add another three per cent to five per cent to the total cost of air travel.

Car rental rates are also expected to increase by three per cent to four per cent, mainly in the US, as hire companies lift rates and add service fees, the report said.

Rates in Europe are expected to stay flat due to fierce competition. The highest car rental increases are predicted in the Asia Pacific region.

A reduction in demand for corporate hotel stays will progressively strengthen buyers negotiation power, the report forecasts.

Rates are predicted to rise by between four and eight per cent, but this prediction is an average of some extremes

In cities where demand is slowing, rates are projected to climb less or not at all. In the Middle East and Asia Pacific, Advito predicts steep rate increases of as much as double the average cited above, the study said.

Corporate meeting budgets and the number of meetings will not increase, but the cost of conducting these will, it added.

Increases are projected to mirror those on the transient side, between four per cent and eight per cent. Certain markets are again projected to display significant rate variation, with some cities in Asia Pacific and the Middle East predicted to be high-demand destinations.

Advito general manager Mary Ellen George said: We recognise that the current macroeconomic situation is uncertain, but we are publishing the Industry Forecast to provide some guidance to travel executives as they plan and negotiate in a volatile environment.

Why Your Bags Aren't Better Off On a Big Airline


Which airlines are most likely to lose your luggage? The bigger ones.

The Department of Transportation issues statistics each month on the rate at which airlines "mishandle" luggage -- that is, don't deliver it to you with your flight. Those statistics bounce up and down, but taking a much longer view reveals that some airlines have been significantly better than others at baggage service.
Over the past 10 years, UAL Corp.'s United Airlines, AMR Corp.'s American Airlines and Delta Air Lines Inc. -- the nation's three biggest carriers -- have the worst baggage-handling records among major airlines. United's mishandled baggage rate between 1998 and 2007 was 29% higher than that of Continental Airlines Inc., which had the best 10-year track record among major air carriers.

Baggage handling has drawn a lot of attention lately from travelers who find they now have to pay for baggage service that used to be free. In general, it has gotten worse at airlines. The rate of mishandled bags for the eight major carriers who were flying 10 years ago was 28% higher in 2007 than it was in 1998.

One eye-popping number: 23 million. That is the number of passengers who have had bags delayed or lost over the past decade by major airlines.

That could turn around because of the baggage fees -- travelers are checking fewer bags to save money, and airline executives say reduced volume should allow them to improve baggage reliability. Fewer bags checked means fewer instances of luggage being left behind because of aircraft weight issues or baggage handlers being overwhelmed with volume and botching flight connections or misrouting suitcases. In July, for instance, the first full month of fees to check any baggage, American says its customers checked one million fewer bags than in July last year, and the number of mishandled bags dropped by 35%.


The Air Transport Association, a trade group representing airlines, blames the nation's clogged air-traffic-control system and growing air-travel delays for the increased rate of mishandled bags over the past decade. "Delays cause missed connections. Missed connections cause mishandled bags," says ATA spokesman David Castelveter.

Airlines with better on-time records also have better baggage records, as delays can lead to luggage getting left behind. As airlines rush to catch up with their schedules, ground time between flights shrinks, leading to more missed connections for baggage.

American, for example, used to fare relatively well in baggage performance, with a baggage-handling rate close to average until 2001. Since then, though, it has worsened every year, as the airline's on-time dependability has also declined. "There is a correlation," says Mark Dupont, American's vice president of airport services. From 2004 on, "there has been a consistent decline in each one -- dependability and baggage."

But American, which has had the highest rate of mishandled bags among major airlines through the first six months of this year, has also lagged behind competitors in buying new technology to improve baggage handling. Other airlines, for example, have been using hand-held bar-code scanners for several years to better track bags and make sure each bag is being loaded into the correct airplane.

American is testing a mobile unit at 10 gates in Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport. The units, mounted in the cab of the tractors that drive bags between connecting flights, give bag runners more timely information on gate changes and other flight information than the sheets of paper they get handed now, which could be 30 minutes old or more and lack gate changes and other information.

Baggage problems are a major source of frustration to airline passengers. When bags turn up missing, airlines often tell passengers that they have no idea what happened to the bag. Worse, even though many passengers now pay baggage fees that can end up being hefty, airlines don't refund the fees if the bags don't arrive on the same flight as the passenger. Passengers who had to wait hours or even days for bags to be delivered often have to file complaints with airlines to get any compensation, and it often comes in the form of vouchers toward future trips, rather than a refund of baggage-service fees.

Rafael Sabbagh Armony and his wife Marcy Neyrinck were returning home to Brazil after a two-week vacation in the U.S. when he flew straight into American's problems. His June 23 American flight from San Francisco to Miami for a connection to Rio de Janeiro was diverted to Los Angeles for an emergency landing. After waiting more than five hours, American put passengers on another plane that didn't arrive in Miami until close to 3 a.m. American gave them vouchers for a hotel room and some food, but held their luggage at the airport, even though they wouldn't leave Miami until 8:35 p.m. the following day.

When Mr. Armony and his wife arrived in Brazil, they learned their luggage hadn't arrived with them. It was on the next flight, which wasn't scheduled to land until two and a half hours later.

"The vacation itself in the United States was really nice. We loved being there," Mr. Armony says. "But the airplane part was traumatic."

American's Mr. Dupont says the baggage should have been returned to the couple that night in Miami, then rechecked the next day and carried on the correct flight to Brazil.

Delta was consistently better than the industry average for lost bags until 2003; since then, it has been significantly worse than the industry average. Delta says its renewed emphasis on building up its hubs in Atlanta and New York-Kennedy mean the old, mostly manual baggage systems in those locations were overwhelmed. In Atlanta, for example, drivers shuttle bags between terminals, as conveyor belts don't link most of Delta's terminals. "The Atlanta baggage infrastructure was built for only one-fifth of the volume we handle now," says Steve Gorman, Delta's executive vice president for operations.

The airline is halfway through a $100 million capital campaign that includes new conveyor belts and baggage technology. This year Delta began deploying hand-held scanners. And technology will tackle another frequent cause of mishandled bags: Luggage that arrives in Atlanta but doesn't connect to flights more than two hours away gets dumped in a holding area -- sometimes to be forgotten. Workers have to manually fish them out for their connecting flights.

Tighter controls have been put in place that have lowered missed connections, Mr. Gorman says, and next year, new technology will automatically flag bags when it is time to load them for connecting flights.

Over the past 10 years, Continental, Southwest Airlines Co. and Alaska Air Group Inc.'s Alaska Airlines have been the best at baggage handling. Continental's prowess is notable because, much like United, American and Delta, it runs big hubs at congested airports, but in eight of the past 10 years, its mishandled-baggage rate has been better than the average of major airlines.

A spokesman says Continental has been treating baggage delivery as one of its most important goals for many years now. "Flying on time helps tremendously, but it also takes investment in equipment and systems," he says.

United, for its part, says it has adopted new technology such as better scanning and tracking of luggage, changed procedures for loading and transferring bags between airplanes, improved maintenance on baggage sorters and the creation of a baggage-control center. Improvements in its on-time performance have led to improved baggage handling over the past five years, too, a spokeswoman says.

The airline suffered turmoil in its operations in 1999 and 2000 amid feuds with labor groups and ended up in bankruptcy reorganization in 2002. But by 2007, United's baggage-handling rate was better than Southwest's. So far this year, it has run slightly better than the average for its peers.

United had its worst year of the past decade in 1999, when it mishandled 7.79 bags per 1,000 passengers, or at least one bag lost for every 128 passengers. That's means that more than one passenger per planeload ended up filling out forms and worrying if belongings would ever be returned.

Over the past five years, US Airways Group Inc. has been the worst carrier at domestic baggage handling among big airlines, including America West Airlines Inc. over that period. (US Airways and America West merged in 2005.) Last year, as the company struggled mightily in its operations as a result of problems integrating the two airlines, it suffered the worst year of any major carrier over the past 10 years: US Airways had 8.47 mishandled baggage reports for every 1,000 passengers, or one report for every 118 domestic passengers.

The airline has undergone an operational turnaround this year and through the first half of 2008 has been better than Delta and American in baggage service.

 

 

Airlines prepare cutbacks on routes, flight frequency

ATLANTA The grip U.S. airlines have on travelers' wallets is about to get tighter as carriers go ahead with plans to trim their domestic schedules because of the high cost of fuel.

Executives acknowledge that despite the economic downturn, fares will rise, discounts currently available will be scarce, and routes and frequencies of flights will be reduced as domestic capacity is cut through the end of the year. The changes starting in September come on top of a litany of new charges for luggage, drinks, pillows and other amenities   ¢  ‚¬  € announced by some airlines earlier this year.

"Airline travel is airline travel it's been bad for a long time," Maureen Stea, an American Airlines frequent flier, said recently at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport. "I suspect prices will go up, fewer people will travel, and if you're willing to pay the price it will be fine."

There were sharp capacity cuts during prior weak economic periods in the early 1990s and between 2001 and 2003, but fares went down as discount carriers moved in and filled the void, offering more competition, analysts said. But the high price of oil, airlines' limited ability to further cut certain costs and the fact that many of the discount carriers are facing the same difficulties as the big carriers make things different this time, analysts said.

"Despite this sluggish U.S. economy, the general demand picture is better than it was post-9/11," said Standard & Poor's analyst Craig Collins. "In addition, you have this consistent response across the board of airlines raising fares and adding fees."

On average, domestic fares between large metro cities are already up roughly 16 percent since Jan. 2, while fares between small cities are up roughly 37 percent year-to-date, according to Ted Brooks, head of airfare research site www.HighFares.com.

The cheapest roundtrip ticket with a 10-day advance purchase, for example, on an American Airlines flight from Chicago to New York cost $258 on Aug. 26, excluding government and airport fees. That was an 87 percent increase from the $138 it cost on Jan. 2 for a similar advance purchase, according to Anita Olander. The cheapest roundtrip ticket with a 21-day advance purchase on a United Airlines flight from Denver to Washington cost $382 on Aug. 26, excluding government and airport fees. That was a 37 percent increase from the $278 it cost on Jan. 2, Collins said.

big cuts ahead

Recently announced airfare sales for travel during the traditionally slow fall season will be harder to come by as more capacity comes out of the system in the last four months of the year.

"If somebody sees a good fare, they should grab it," said Richard Hild, senior checker of marketing and planning for AirTran Airways.

Booking early for travel during peak times like the holiday season generally can get you a cheaper ticket than waiting until the last minute. But, airlines usually do not offer fare sales for travel over the holidays.

American Airlines, United Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Northwest Airlines, Continental Airlines, US Airways, JetBlue Airways, AirTran and Alaska Airlines plan to cut domestic capacity during the third and fourth quarters by single- to double-digit margins.

JetBlue, for instance, in September will end service between several cities, including Boston to San Francisco and Washington to Las Vegas. Southwest Airlines Co., which had resisted the kinds of capacity cuts being made by other carriers, will end service in November between Kansas City and Sacramento, Calif., and between Oakland, Calif., and Tucson, Ariz. Some airlines, including JetBlue and Southwest, are adding or expanding service to states where other carriers are reducing service, like Florida. However, Southwest said recently that it will eliminate nearly 200 flights early next year as it struggles with high fuel costs and a weakening economy.

Fewer overall seats in the air means planes that remain will be fuller, which gives airlines pricing power to raise fares.

"The reality is and I don't want to diminish this the industry is going to have to cover its costs," Eric Reader said.

Travelers are bracing for the impact of higher fares.

On a recent day at DFW Airport, passenger Anita Olander, a classic rock DJ in Wichita Falls, Texas, said she might not be visiting her parents in Los Angeles quite so often this fall.

"If I can find a $200 ticket, I'll go," she said. "If there are fewer flights, that won't bother me, but if flights are really expensive, I just won't go or I'll go by myself instead of bringing my son and husband."

At Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, passenger Alberta Bradley, a retired municipal worker, said she can afford the fare increases. What bugs her, though, are all the new fees.

"I'd just rather they incorporate that in the fare," Bradley said of baggage fees some airlines are charging. "And then you're good to go. You don't have to worry about that."

Charges for soda

Several airlines are now charging fees for a first checked bag. Some have imposed a fuel surcharge on frequent flier reward tickets. US Airways is even charging for soda.

Cuts in the number of flights in the U.S. also could mean people who booked flights far in advance for travel after September might have to fly at a different time or, if a route has been eliminated by their carrier, they might have to find another airline to get them to their destination. But airlines don't expect that to be a big issue.

"A very, very small number of people would have purchased tickets for travel in September or thereafter before the flights were taken out of the fall schedule in May and June of this year," American spokesman Cary Casas said.

As for frequent fliers, capacity cuts could mean fewer award seats available at the lowest level of award travel. Casas said that in American's case, people could pony up more of their frequent flier miles to guarantee they get a reward ticket for any available seat on a flight. Atlanta-based Delta recently announced a similar guarantee.

While the price of a barrel of oil has fallen from a high of $147.27 in July to about $117 recently, that is not likely to slow the upward spike in fares, according to fare researcher Collins. The current price of oil is still more than five times what it was in mid-August 1992, and it is more than four times what it was in mid-August 2002.

"I think if oil prices continue to go down, you will hear calls for relaxation of fuel surcharges, but that doesn't mean they won't hike base airfares," Jim Carter said.

He said that if load factors reach 90 percent, "There will be no reason to discount

 

 

 

Airlines Revive Minimum Stays On Cheap Fares

Get ready for a wave of annoying airline rules requiring you to stay at your destination a minimum number of days or over a Saturday night -- if you want the cheapest tickets.

The move is an effort to force business travelers, who usually need the most flexibility and want to be home on the weekends, to pay more for their flights.

A recent check by FareCompare.com7 found that 64% of the 5,335 round-trip air fares for sale at UAL Corp.'s United Airlines, for example, had some sort of minimum-stay requirement. Most were two- and three-night stay requirements.

Fare consulting firm Harrell Associates LLC compared restrictions on round-trip tickets on 280 routes at six big airlines and found the number of weekend-stay requirements was actually down 10% compared to a January sample, while the number of three-night stay requirements was up 87%.

"That's a new phenomenon," said Bob Harrell, president of the firm. "It's not the dreaded Saturday-night stay -- it's three nights. The three-night thing is sort of a backdoor way to try to block business travelers."


Middle Seat columnist Scott McCartney takes a look at the latest ups and downs of online ticket pricing.
Airlines tried to bring back Saturday-night stay requirements earlier this year -- but were thwarted. United Airlines added the requirement to its cheapest tickets, and some competitors matched. Travelers feared the worst; stories abounded about the return of the hated requirement.

But the change didn't stick, mostly because discounters compete on so many routes these days, and United and others have had to remove the restriction this summer from most fares. "We were unsuccessful in a broad-based introduction of Saturday-night stay requirements," said John Tague, chief operating officer at United. "We do continue to try to expand the Saturday-night stay."

Now, airline executives say they will try again, and again.

The airlines are going back to their old playbooks. For many years the Saturday-night requirement was a prime tactic airlines used to separate business travelers from leisure customers. The Saturday-night stay forced many business travelers to either pay hundreds of dollars more for each ticket, or to spend an extra night or two on the road to save money. If the choice was a $300 ticket or a $2,000 ticket, many companies would ask travelers to stay over Saturday night at a nice hotel, have a nice meal and still save hundreds.

But as discount airlines spread into more markets, bringing simpler pricing that often didn't have such onerous restrictions, incumbent carriers lost customers and were ultimately forced to simplify their pricing to stay competitive.

In early 2005, Delta Air Lines Inc. overhauled its pricing structure with "Simplifares," capping its highest domestic fare at $499 one-way and removing many restrictions on tickets. Other airlines matched, putting their pricing in line with discount airlines, and business travelers had easy choices. By booking in advance, they could still get discounted tickets even if their itinerary didn't include a weekend.

High fuel prices spelled the end of simplified pricing, and now airline executives have business travelers in their crosshairs. Because they may not be as price-sensitive as vacationers or people flying off to visit friends or relatives, airlines are scrambling for ways to get business travelers to spend more.

"Simplifares was unsuccessful," says Delta's chief executive, Richard Anderson. The fare structure gave Delta only 86% of the industry's average revenue per aircraft seat-mile, a standard measure in the airline business averaging revenue over each seat flown one mile. With the return to more traditional pricing, Delta is up to about 100% of the industry's average revenue per available seat-mile, he said.

"You really have to have a differential," Mr. Anderson said. "We offer different products to different customers based on their attributes. That's better for an international carrier offering frequency and utility and different products on the same airplane."

So far this year, many business travelers have found ways around increases in both fare prices and restrictions. One way is to buy tickets early when cheaper fares are available before they sell out. Another is to skip first-class tickets and business-class tickets on some trips, riding coach instead. Orbitz for Business calculated that air fares were up 8.5% in the first half of this year, but the tickets clients actually bought were up only 1.6%.

Business traveler Tom Pontes became so angered by "fare discrimination" -- charging business customers much higher prices -- that he switched most of his flying to Southwest Airlines Co. from US Airways Group Inc. He flies US Airways only when it happens to be cheaper than Southwest.

"It burns me to sit in a seat for $800 while the guy next to me paid $400, or $200, for exactly the same seat, going to the same place at the same time, with the same cabin service," said Mr. Pontes, who flies out of Providence, R.I. "Ask people who've just purchased the same car or the same iPod how much they paid, and the satisfaction with their purchase is highest only if they both paid exactly the same thing."

As airlines ground planes this fall and tighten the supply of seats, they will be looking for opportunities to get business travelers to pay more, and may revert to wider imposition of Saturday-night stay requirements.

Mr. Anderson said Delta is "working on doing that. Our belief is that is the structural way in the market to differentiate" between types of customers. Doing that allows Delta to offer lower fares to price-sensitive customers, by charging higher prices to those with bigger wallets.

Mr. Tague of United agrees. "I think the pricing structure needs to be segmented," he said. Fares have to still go up to cover fuel costs, and one way to do that is to get business travelers to buy more-expensive tickets without raising prices on discounted tickets so high that leisure travelers stop buying.

"The industry is in no position to view fuel pressure as temporary," Mr. Tague said.

Of course, the problem the industry has is that discount airlines continue to grow, and business travelers see them as a more-viable alternative as the price gap widens in fares. If big airlines run their prices up too high by making discounted tickets unavailable to business travelers, they risk losing customers. That's been the history, likely to repeat this fall

 

 

 

May 16th, 2008

AAA Recommends Travelers Budget $244 Per Day

According to the 2008 edition of AAA's Annual Vacation Costs Survey the recommended travel budget for two adults traveling together in North America is $244 per day for lodging and meals. "Vacation spending depends on personal preferences and means," said Michael Petrone, director, AAA Tourism Information Development. "While you can expect higher lodging rates in metropolitan areas and during peak travel seasons, travelers can save by making advance reservations and taking advantage of discounts."

According to the survey the average cost for lodging in North America is $164 per night, double occupancy, based on the most recent published rates for AAA Approved(R) accommodations listed in the AAA TourBook(R) guides. For two adults traveling and dining together AAA travel experts recommend budgeting $80 a day for meals, not including tips or beverages. These costs are based on dining at full-service restaurants. If traveling by car, AAA recommends visiting www.aaafuelcostcalculator.com to estimate fuel costs and using the AAA TripTik(R) Travel Planner to plan the best route

Back to the top

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

European Fuel Surcharges Now Being Charged

American Airlines - $210 to $306
Air France - $270
Air India - $230
Alitalia - $270
British Airways - $242 to $306
Continental - $240 to $270
Condor - $270
Delta - $270
Aer Lingus - $150-$200
Icelandair - $78-$158
Iberia - $270
KLM - $270
Lufthansa - $170
LOT Polish - $200
LTU International - $250
Swiss - $190
Malev - $270
Northwest - $270
Austrian - $170
SAS - $340
Singapore Airlines - $170
Turkish - $210
United - $170 to $306
US Airways - $242
Virgin Atlantic - $242-$306

Back to the top

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lufthansa Adjusts Fuel Surcharge On European And Long-Haul Routes

In recent weeks, crude oil and kerosene prices have continued to rise and have now reached an all-time high. In response to this development, Lufthansa is adjusting its fuel surcharge on all its flights. The fuel surcharge on long-haul routes will be raised by five euros to 82 euros per flight segment. The fuel surcharge on domestic German and intra-European routes will increase by four euros to 21 euros per flight leg. The increases will apply to all Lufthansa tickets issued on or after 14 May 2008.

Lufthansa last increased its fuel surcharge on European flights on 13 March 2008 by three euros to 17 euros. The surcharge on long-haul flights was last raised on 14 November 2007 by ten euros to 77 euros.

Back to the top

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATA Forecasts 2.7 Mln Fewer Summer Passengers

About 2.7 million fewer passengers will travel with major US airlines this summer due partly to high fuel prices, a weakening economy and capacity cuts, the Air Transport Association of America (ATA) said on Tuesday.

The ATA forecast that 211.5 million passengers will fly between June 1 and August 31, down 2.7 million, or more than 1 percent, from the 214.2 million who traveled during the same months of 2007.

"For a variety of reasons, slightly fewer people will fly this summer and planes will be approaching 85 percent full," ATA Chief Executive James May said. "While New York remains a choke point, airlines, airports and government are doing all they can to avoid lengthy delays."

The ATA is the trade organization for major US airlines. ATA members and their affiliates transport more than 90 percent of US airline passenger and cargo traffic

Back to the top

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May13th, 2008

Will fliers revolt as airfares head up?

Air travelers may soon start to balk at flying as airlines continue to push through fare hikes. That latest increase - €“ $20 round-trip on the three biggest U.S. carriers - €“ was announced yesterday at a time when domestic airlines are desperately trying to raise fares fast enough to keep pace with the soaring cost of jet fuel. U.S. carriers have already tried to raise fares between 15 and 20 times this year, according to various airfare observers and experts. But, now, Reuters writes some industry observers predict airlines' "attempts to balance their fuel bills through fare increases may soon meet stubborn resistance from customers."

"If (oil) really does shoot up to $130, $140, $150, there's really no way that airlines can raise prices high enough to cover that cost because consumers are going to push back more quickly than they are right now," Rick Seaney, CEO of airline ticket research site FareCompare.com, tells Reuters. His comments come as news broke this morning that oil has yet another high, pushing past $125 per barrel in early trading.

As for the latest $20 fare hike €“- instituted by American, United and Delta €“- the airlines say they have no choice but to boost fares as jet-fuel hits record levels. "This is obviously a result of the current market, and fares have to reflect the cost of doing business," Delta spokeswoman Betsy Talton tells The Associated Press. Additionally, AP says that with fuel now the biggest cost at most U.S. carriers, airlines have not only "been racing to raise airfares," but also to "tack on surcharges, and charge for amenities such as extra bags and legroom as they struggle to cope with soaring energy prices."

When will consumers start to resist? Farecompare.com's Seaney tells The Atlanta Journal-Constitution he doesn't think fares have hit "the tipping point"... yet. "We are getting really close to it, but I'm not sure we're there yet." Seaney predicts more increases, and even the airlines acknowledge that's likely. "The carriers are playing catch-up," says David Castelveter of the Air Transport Association, a trade group representing big airlines. "The reality is the price of a ticket is increasing, but not nearly enough to offset the cost of fuel," he tells the Journal-Constitution.

But the fare hikes aren't hitting all customers equally. Big airlines have been slower to raise fares on highly competitive routes, especially routes that have service on low-cost carriers like Southwest, AirTran or JetBlue. Those route-specific fare hikes, in effect, tend to maximize the impact of increases on routes with less competition -- exaggerating the effect in some smaller and medium-sized markets. "Leisure and business travelers on noncompetitive routes, especially on routes over 1,500 miles, are paying $280 or more round trip since Dec. 20, 2007," Tom Parsons, CEO of Bestfares.com, tells the Fort Worth Star-Telegram

Elsewhere, Parsons says "we still see low-cost airlines, such as Southwest, offering bargain-basement air fares as low as $58 round trip between routes such as Chicago and Indianapolis, Dallas and Tulsa, Houston and San Antonio." But but don't get too used to that. Even at Southwest, CEO Gary Kelly says "we'll be looking for opportunities" for further fare increases, The New York Times writes.

Back to the top

 
 
Master Card Visa American Express